Evaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10033/338725
Title:
Evaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions.
Authors:
Ohlmeier, C; Linder, R; Enders, D; Mikolajczyk, R ( 0000-0003-1271-7204 ) ; Haverkamp, W; Horenkamp-Sonntag, D; Garbe, E
Abstract:
To compare the quality of care regarding the use of elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in the inpatient and outpatient setting and to evaluate different methods of confounder control in this context.
Affiliation:
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Citation:
Evaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions. 2014, 53 (4):269-77 Methods Inf Med
Journal:
Methods of information in medicine
Issue Date:
2014
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10033/338725
DOI:
10.3414/ME13-01-0132
PubMed ID:
25077437
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
0026-1270
Appears in Collections:
Publications of the AG (ESME)

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorOhlmeier, Cen
dc.contributor.authorLinder, Ren
dc.contributor.authorEnders, Den
dc.contributor.authorMikolajczyk, Ren
dc.contributor.authorHaverkamp, Wen
dc.contributor.authorHorenkamp-Sonntag, Den
dc.contributor.authorGarbe, Een
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-23T13:56:55Zen
dc.date.available2015-01-23T13:56:55Zen
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citationEvaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions. 2014, 53 (4):269-77 Methods Inf Meden
dc.identifier.issn0026-1270en
dc.identifier.pmid25077437en
dc.identifier.doi10.3414/ME13-01-0132en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10033/338725en
dc.description.abstractTo compare the quality of care regarding the use of elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in the inpatient and outpatient setting and to evaluate different methods of confounder control in this context.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleEvaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359 Bremen, Germany.en
dc.identifier.journalMethods of information in medicineen

Related articles on PubMed

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in HZI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.