Contact diaries versus wearable proximity sensors in measuring contact patterns at a conference: method comparison and participants' attitudes.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue Date
2016
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Studies measuring contact networks have helped to improve our understanding of infectious disease transmission. However, several methodological issues are still unresolved, such as which method of contact measurement is the most valid. Further, complete network analysis requires data from most, ideally all, members of a network and, to achieve this, acceptance of the measurement method. We aimed at investigating measurement error by comparing two methods of contact measurement - paper diaries vs. wearable proximity sensors - that were applied concurrently to the same population, and we measured acceptability.Citation
Contact diaries versus wearable proximity sensors in measuring contact patterns at a conference: method comparison and participants' attitudes. 2016, 16:341 BMC Infect. Dis.Affiliation
Helmholtz Centre for infection research, Inhoffenstr. 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.Journal
BMC infectious diseasesPubMed ID
27449511Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1471-2334ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s12879-016-1676-y
Scopus Count
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/