Is autoinducer-2 a universal signal for interspecies communication: a comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis of the synthesis and signal transduction pathways
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue Date
2004-09-29
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background Quorum sensing is a process of bacterial cell-to-cell communication involving the production and detection of extracellular signaling molecules called autoinducers. Recently, it has been proposed that autoinducer-2 (AI-2), a furanosyl borate diester derived from the recycling of S-adenosyl-homocysteine (SAH) to homocysteine, serves as a universal signal for interspecies communication. Results In this study, 138 completed genomes were examined for the genes involved in the synthesis and detection of AI-2. Except for some symbionts and parasites, all organisms have a pathway to recycle SAH, either using a two-step enzymatic conversion by the Pfs and LuxS enzymes or a one-step conversion using SAH-hydrolase (SahH). 51 organisms including most Gamma-, Beta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria, and Firmicutes possess the Pfs-LuxS pathway, while Archaea, Eukarya, Alphaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Cyanobacteria prefer the SahH pathway. In all 138 organisms, only the three Vibrio strains had strong, bidirectional matches to the periplasmic AI-2 binding protein LuxP and the central signal relay protein LuxU. The initial two-component sensor kinase protein LuxQ, and the terminal response regulator luxO are found in most Proteobacteria, as well as in some Firmicutes, often in several copies. Conclusions The genomic analysis indicates that the LuxS enzyme required for AI-2 synthesis is widespread in bacteria, while the periplasmic binding protein LuxP is only present in Vibrio strains. Thus, other organisms may either use components different from the AI-2 signal transduction system of Vibrio strains to sense the signal of AI-2, or they do not have such a quorum sensing system at all.Citation
BMC Evolutionary Biology 2004 4:36Publisher
BioMed CentralPubMed ID
15456522PubMed Central ID
524169Additional Links
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/4/36http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
Language
en_USISSN
1471-2148ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/1471-2148-4-36
Scopus Count
The following license files are associated with this item:
Related articles
- Assessment of the roles of LuxS, S-ribosyl homocysteine, and autoinducer 2 in cell attachment during biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e.
- Authors: Challan Belval S, Gal L, Margiewes S, Garmyn D, Piveteau P, Guzzo J
- Issue date: 2006 Apr
- Regulation of LuxPQ receptor activity by the quorum-sensing signal autoinducer-2.
- Authors: Neiditch MB, Federle MJ, Miller ST, Bassler BL, Hughson FM
- Issue date: 2005 May 27
- Let LuxS speak up in AI-2 signaling.
- Authors: De Keersmaecker SC, Sonck K, Vanderleyden J
- Issue date: 2006 Mar
- A LuxP-based fluorescent sensor for bacterial autoinducer II.
- Authors: Zhu J, Pei D
- Issue date: 2008 Feb 15
- The impact of mutations in the quorum sensing systems of Aeromonas hydrophila, Vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio harveyi on their virulence towards gnotobiotically cultured Artemia franciscana.
- Authors: Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W
- Issue date: 2005 Aug