Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10033/621320
Title:
Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
Authors:
Karch, Annika; Koch, Armin; Zapf, Antonia; Zerr, Inga; Karch, André ( 0000-0003-3014-8543 )
Abstract:
To investigate how choice of gold standard biases estimates of sensitivity and specificity in studies reassessing the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers that are already part of a lifetime composite gold standard (CGS).
Affiliation:
Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Citation:
Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard. 2016, 78:73-82 J Clin Epidemiol
Journal:
Journal of clinical epidemiology
Issue Date:
Oct-2016
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10033/621320
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.022
PubMed ID:
27107877
Type:
Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
1878-5921
Appears in Collections:
Publications of the AG (ESME)

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorKarch, Annikaen
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Arminen
dc.contributor.authorZapf, Antoniaen
dc.contributor.authorZerr, Ingaen
dc.contributor.authorKarch, Andréen
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-12T15:04:42Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-12T15:04:42Z-
dc.date.issued2016-10-
dc.identifier.citationPartial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard. 2016, 78:73-82 J Clin Epidemiolen
dc.identifier.issn1878-5921-
dc.identifier.pmid27107877-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10033/621320-
dc.description.abstractTo investigate how choice of gold standard biases estimates of sensitivity and specificity in studies reassessing the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers that are already part of a lifetime composite gold standard (CGS).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshAutopsyen
dc.subject.meshBiasen
dc.subject.meshBiomarkersen
dc.subject.meshComputer Simulationen
dc.subject.meshCreutzfeldt-Jakob Syndromeen
dc.subject.meshDiagnostic Tests, Routineen
dc.subject.meshHumansen
dc.subject.meshReference Standardsen
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.titlePartial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentHelmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.en
dc.identifier.journalJournal of clinical epidemiologyen

Related articles on PubMed

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in HZI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.